Request demo

Self-learning AI agents that run your team’s processes.

Across turns documents, systems, and expert know-how into a reasoning graph, the self-improving harness your agents run on.

Request a demo See it at work

Built on over a decade of UC Berkeley and Stanford research

Trusted by teams at

Accounts receivable · Accounts payable · Insurance claims & fraud

Explore financial operations

Built for work that has to be right.

More work from the team you already have.

In AP, matching invoices keep moving. Across investigates exceptions and prepares the next decision, so your team reviews the cases that need judgment.

Validated on real workflows in three weeks.

Your first process is built on your data, or on synthetic data from your rules when data can’t leave, and tested against success criteria you set before the build.

A rule change is a sentence, not a project.

Your team describes the change in plain language. Across updates only the affected steps and waits for approval.

Built to pass your security review.

Cleared by IT, InfoSec, and risk teams at a Fortune 100 technology company.

Why our customers choose us.

“What made Across AI work for us wasn’t just the intelligence; it was the ease of use. Our reps stay in Slack, get clear next-best actions, and spend more time moving deals forward instead of updating systems.”

VP SalesOpaque

Read all customer stories Read the Fortune 100 story

One platform for every process.

Explore the platform

  1. Ingest

    Across studies your documents, system records, and expert interviews to understand the process.

    Process policyApproval rules
    Resolved examplesWhat the team did
    Expert interviewsPractical knowledge
    Understand before designing

    Identify the decisions, rules, and missing context.

    What needs approval? Which exceptions matter?

  2. Design and review

    The Architect proposes the steps and their dependencies. Your expert reviews the graph before the build.

    Proposed design · expert reviewDesign review
    ContextInvoice + receiptPartial delivery
    Decision rulePrepare split paymentPay received quantity only
    Next actionPost invoiceAP lead approvalProposed automatic actionApproval before payment
    Architect

    Should a split payment post automatically?

    AP lead

    No. Send every split payment to me for approval.

    Graph updated

    Approval added before the payment action.

    Ready for expert sign-off

  3. Build and test

    Past cases run through the graph before anything goes live.

    Test → improve → test againTest run
    1. 1Matched invoicePassed
    2. 2Partial receiptPassed
    3. 3Prepaid freightPassed
    4. 4Split-payment approvalPassed
      Why test case 4 failed on the first run
      Expected AP lead approvalActual Automatic posting
    5. 5Missing purchase orderPassed
    6. 6Price tolerancePassed
    7. 7Duplicate invoicePassed
    Architect

    The split-payment case skipped approval. Add an AP lead approval step before posting.

    Approval step added. Rerunning the affected case.

    The approval step now passes. All seven cases are ready for expert review.

    7 passed after correctionExpert review before deployment

  4. Go live and optimize

    Real work runs through it. The Operator catches rule changes.

    # ap-policy · a new document changes the processPolicy update
    AP lead 09:41

    Here is the new policy. Split payments now need the finance director’s approval.

    AP_policy_v4.pdfUpdated approval policy
    Operator

    Approval owner changed: AP lead → Finance director. Handing the affected route to the Architect.

    Architect

    Update the approval node. Keep the receipt and freight checks. Retest the affected cases.

    UnchangedPrepare split payment
    Approval nodeAP leadFinance director
    After approvalPost payment
    Retesting affected cases…✓ Tests pass. New graph ready for the process owner’s approval.
across / new run start here

Let us help you get work done.

Request a demo See customer stories